Validation

Calibrated to the trials,
checked against the trials.

Every projection rests on a chain of evidence: the twin is calibrated to published phase-3 endpoints, then held to external echocardiography, cohort scatter and parameter-sensitivity checks. The figures below are reproduced natively from the validation analyses.

External validation against the STEP-HFpEF echocardiography substudy

Solomon SD et al., JACC 2024. The twin recovers the left-atrial volume endpoint on target, carries the placebo-corrected slope within published bounds, and reproduces the echocardiographic effect profile.

ALA volume trajectory
Treatment (semaglutide) Placebo
BTreatment effect on LA volume by weight loss
Published slope = +0.55 mL/kg
Simulated slope = +0.52 mL/kg
P interaction = 0.033
Published 95% CI Published (Solomon) Simulated (n = 245) Simulated regression
CEchocardiography substudy endpoints
Solomon JACC 2024 (n = 491) Simulated digital twin

Calibration summary

EndpointSimTarget
LA ETD (mL)−6.13−6.13
LA slope (mL/kg)+0.52+0.55
E/e′ ETD−1.97−0.79

LA volume regression is driven jointly by weight loss (plasma-volume reduction) and E/e′ improvement (reduced LA stretch). No new ODE state required.

Drug-class generalization — five incretin-based therapies

Each agent's weight-loss parameter (e_W) is back-solved to its published headline; the same coupled ODE then projects every downstream state. Projected 52-week trajectories in obesity-related HFpEF.

ABody weight (kg)
BE/e′ (filling pressure)
CCardiac output (L/min)

Cohort scatter reproduction — simulated vs SUMMIT (Packer JACC 2025)

Per-patient changes from a simulated cohort overlaid on the published SUMMIT scatter, by diabetes status. The simulated correlation matches the published value at the cohort level.

Simulated (diabetes) Simulated (no diabetes) Published (diabetes) Published (no diabetes)
AParacardial fat
rsim = +0.359
rpub = 0.36
BLeft-ventricular mass
rsim = +0.324
rpub = 0.31

Local one-at-a-time parameter sensitivity

Each parameter perturbed ±20% from baseline; bars show the resulting change in each endpoint. The drug-effect parameters dominate; downstream coupling terms are second-order.

ABody weight  baseline −14.22%
BLV mass ETD  baseline −10.98 g
CParacardial fat ETD  baseline −44.64 mL
+20% perturbation −20% perturbation